Ghanaian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ghanaians
Zimbabweans
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,278,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 10.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 59.7% |
| Range | 50.5% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 22.2% | 18.9% |
| Median | 20.7% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |