European vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
European
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Turks
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,036,354 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 13.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Turkish |
| Minimum | 15.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 84.7% | 66.2% |
| Mean | 43.6% | 20.0% |
| Median | 30.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.6% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.1% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 14.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |