Ethiopian vs Nonimmigrants Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Nonimmigrants
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Nonimmigrants
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Nonimmigrants Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,684,975 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,347,723 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 30.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Nonimmigrants |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 34.7% | 26.2% |
| Range | 33.6% | 21.8% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 12.4% |
| Median | 10.2% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are French Canadian (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Bahamian (14.6%, a difference of 0.13%), U.S. Virgin Islander (14.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Ottawa (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |