Danish vs Immigrants from Austria Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,175,861 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,272,500 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 0.58%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Danish	Immigrants from Austria
Minimum	9.6%	1.0%
Maximum	100.0%	79.1%
Range	90.4%	78.0%
Mean	33.8%	22.8%
Median	22.4%	18.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	17.2%	15.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	37.4%	25.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.2%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	26.1%	15.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	25.9%	15.6%

Demographics Similar to Danes and Immigrants from Austria by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%
French Canadians	73.0 /100 \| #162	Good 19.9%