Creek vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Zimbabweans
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,438,059 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 38.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 21.7% |
| Range | 55.8% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 10.3% |
| Median | 19.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |