Costa Rican vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,285,350 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 18.3%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Costa Rican	Immigrants from China
Minimum	1.2%	0.83%
Maximum	50.0%	42.3%
Range	48.8%	41.4%
Mean	15.3%	12.6%
Median	14.3%	10.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.9%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.2%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.3%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.7%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.6%	7.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Israelis	76.5 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Nepal	76.0 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Yugoslavians	75.9 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	74.8 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	71.3 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	71.3 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	69.6 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%