Central American Indian vs Yuman Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Yuman
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Yuman
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Yuman Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,052,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,667,603 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 27.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Yuman |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 94.9% | 64.1% |
| Range | 93.0% | 56.9% |
| Mean | 23.8% | 25.8% |
| Median | 17.9% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.5% | 35.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Yuman by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Crow (19.1%, a difference of 2.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 3.1%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 3.4%), Pima (20.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and Sioux (18.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |