Burmese vs Thai Family Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Thai
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Thais
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Thai Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,767,426 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Thai |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 0.91% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 11.5% |
| Range | 28.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 4.7% |
| Median | 5.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Thais by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 4.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 5.4%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |