Black/African American vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Bulgarian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Bulgarians
26.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,844,425 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,529,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 40.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Black/African American | Bulgarian |
| Minimum | 17.1% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 49.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.1% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 28.1% | 22.4% |
| Median | 27.8% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.8% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 16.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.95%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |