Bhutanese vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Filipino
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Bhutanese
Filipinos
12.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,468,872 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,988,571 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 13.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Filipino |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 19.0% |
| Range | 37.9% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 7.9% |
| Median | 9.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Thai (11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |