Basque vs Immigrants from Africa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Immigrants from Africa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Immigrants from Africa
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
28.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
16.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Immigrants from Africa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,728,632 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,681,104 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 54.5% |
| Range | 93.9% | 51.2% |
| Mean | 29.2% | 23.1% |
| Median | 22.6% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Immigrants from Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |