Aleut vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Dominica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Dominica
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 30.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Dominica |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 54.5% |
| Range | 48.7% | 52.1% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 18.0% |
| Median | 12.0% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 10.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |