Aleut vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Africa
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,739,595 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,521,718 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 42.9% | 42.2% |
| Range | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 13.1% |
| Median | 10.1% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Immigrants from Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (9.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |