Albanian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
COMPARE
Albanian
Immigrants from China
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Albanians
Immigrants from China
11.7%
POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Immigrants from China Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,180,317 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Albanian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.071% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 26.5% |
Range | 16.3% | 23.5% |
Mean | 9.1% | 11.4% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians and Immigrants from China by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.17%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sri Lankan (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |