Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa

0.0%
10.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1.741308.8%6.3%(+2.44)#2247.2%(+1.56)#11,061
2.741038.2%6.3%(+1.87)#2497.2%(+0.992)#12,563
3.741277.3%6.3%(+0.976)#2987.2%(+0.096)#15,314
4.741346.4%6.3%(+0.082)#3667.2%(-0.798)#18,336
5.741126.4%6.3%(+0.074)#3687.2%(-0.806)#18,364
6.741196.4%6.3%(+0.054)#3697.2%(-0.826)#18,426
7.741066.2%6.3%(-0.127)#3787.2%(-1.01)#19,058
8.741356.2%6.3%(-0.179)#3847.2%(-1.06)#19,226
9.741335.3%6.3%(-1.07)#4467.2%(-1.95)#22,193
10.741075.2%6.3%(-1.12)#4497.2%(-2.00)#22,339
11.741265.0%6.3%(-1.39)#4647.2%(-2.27)#23,180
12.741054.9%6.3%(-1.50)#4717.2%(-2.38)#23,471
13.741104.7%6.3%(-1.66)#4837.2%(-2.54)#23,913
14.741364.6%6.3%(-1.72)#4847.2%(-2.60)#24,096
15.741374.5%6.3%(-1.84)#4927.2%(-2.72)#24,412
16.741314.4%6.3%(-1.90)#4977.2%(-2.78)#24,573
17.741294.3%6.3%(-2.09)#5137.2%(-2.97)#25,077
18.741204.2%6.3%(-2.17)#5187.2%(-3.05)#25,280
19.741464.1%6.3%(-2.23)#5197.2%(-3.11)#25,411
20.741324.1%6.3%(-2.24)#5227.2%(-3.12)#25,452
21.741044.0%6.3%(-2.37)#5287.2%(-3.25)#25,729
22.741143.9%6.3%(-2.45)#5307.2%(-3.33)#25,919
23.741453.6%6.3%(-2.76)#5477.2%(-3.64)#26,551
24.741153.5%6.3%(-2.83)#5517.2%(-3.71)#26,664
25.741283.1%6.3%(-3.22)#5647.2%(-4.10)#27,348
26.741083.1%6.3%(-3.29)#5697.2%(-4.17)#27,476
27.741162.5%6.3%(-3.80)#5787.2%(-4.68)#28,145

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
8.8%
#2
8.2%
#3
7.3%
#4
6.4%
#5
6.4%
#6
6.4%
#7
6.2%
#8
6.2%
#9
5.3%
#10
5.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK?
74130 has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK with 8.8%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Tulsa is 4.9%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Oklahoma is 6.3%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.