Ute vs Puerto Rican In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Ute
Puerto Rican
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Ute
Puerto Ricans
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Puerto Rican In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,777,959 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 80.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Puerto Rican |
Minimum | 5.9% | 52.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.1% | 47.4% |
Mean | 69.3% | 80.4% |
Median | 75.8% | 81.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.5% | 77.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.5% | 84.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.6% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Puerto Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Chickasaw (80.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |