Shoshone vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Shoshone
Yup'ik
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Shoshone
Yup'ik
79.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
78.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,619,718 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010 and weighted average of 79.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,957,049 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 78.6%, a difference of 0.82%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 45.2% | 28.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.8% | 71.4% |
Mean | 78.7% | 79.3% |
Median | 80.7% | 81.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.9% | 73.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.3% | 87.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Black/African American (79.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Comanche (79.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Ottawa (79.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Colville (79.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Chickasaw (79.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Yaqui (78.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (79.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Crow (78.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Kiowa (78.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (79.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 80.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 80.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 79.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 79.8% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 79.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 79.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 79.3% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 79.3% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 79.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 79.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 79.0% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 78.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 78.6% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 78.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 78.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 78.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 78.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 78.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 78.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 78.0% |