Navajo vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Navajo
Houma
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Navajo
Houma
73.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,798,006 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 73.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,405 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 79.5%, a difference of 7.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Houma |
Minimum | 31.8% | 52.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 97.6% |
Range | 68.2% | 45.6% |
Mean | 69.5% | 78.8% |
Median | 70.2% | 80.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.7% | 72.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.1% | 83.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (74.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |