Lumbee vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Lumbee
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Lumbee
Pima
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,461 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 77.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Pima |
Minimum | 42.1% | 46.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.9% | 53.6% |
Mean | 80.3% | 79.8% |
Median | 79.4% | 81.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.2% | 71.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.5% | 95.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.2% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |