Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Carpatho Rusyn In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,804,758 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 41.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,860,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 40.8%, a difference of 2.4%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Carpatho Rusyn
Minimum	19.7%	21.5%
Maximum	75.0%	62.8%
Range	55.3%	41.3%
Mean	46.4%	42.7%
Median	44.0%	42.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	41.2%	35.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	53.0%	50.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.9%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.8%	9.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.7%	9.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Carpatho Rusyns by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Yugoslavian (41.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Liberian (41.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (41.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (41.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Congo (41.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Icelander (40.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cree (40.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Indonesian (40.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Sudan (41.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and Croatian (41.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Scottish	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 42.0%
Irish	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 42.0%
Czechoslovakians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 41.9%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 41.8%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 41.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 41.7%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 41.7%
Sioux	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 41.5%
Scotch-Irish	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 41.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 41.5%
Celtics	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 41.3%
Whites/Caucasians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 41.3%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 41.2%
Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 41.1%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 41.1%
Immigrants \| Sudan	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 41.0%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 40.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 40.8%
Cree	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 40.8%
Indonesians	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 40.7%