Chilean vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chilean
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Chileans
Lithuanians
66.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
17.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,687,102 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,961,459 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 41.3% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 84.2% | 76.6% |
| Range | 42.9% | 43.3% |
| Mean | 64.1% | 59.0% |
| Median | 65.3% | 61.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 54.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.7% | 64.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Chileans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Laos (66.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and South American Indian (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South American Indians | 99.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bermudans | 99.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Iranians | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Aleuts | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovene (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Jamaican (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
| Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
| Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
| Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
| Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
| Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
| Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
| Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |