Bhutanese vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 16-19

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Bhutanese Ute

COMPARE

Bhutanese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean BermudanBhutaneseBlackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Ute

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian UruguayanUteVenezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 16-19

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison

Bhutanese

Ute

Fair

Good

36.3%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19

35.3/ 100

METRIC RATING

185th/ 347

METRIC RANK

37.1%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19

75.7/ 100

METRIC RATING

158th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Bhutanese vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,665,515 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,645,372 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.577 and weighted average of 37.1%, a difference of 2.2%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Ute
Minimum	18.6%	5.6%
Maximum	100.0%	63.1%
Range	81.4%	57.5%
Mean	37.8%	37.6%
Median	36.0%	38.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	29.8%	26.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.4%	44.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.6%	17.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.9%	14.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.8%	14.4%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Costa Rican (36.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (36.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (36.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (36.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Europe (36.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Blacks/African Americans	45.1 /100 \| #178	Average 36.5%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	43.3 /100 \| #179	Average 36.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	41.1 /100 \| #180	Average 36.4%
Jordanians	39.6 /100 \| #181	Fair 36.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	39.1 /100 \| #182	Fair 36.4%
Eastern Europeans	38.8 /100 \| #183	Fair 36.4%
Costa Ricans	36.1 /100 \| #184	Fair 36.3%
Bhutanese	35.3 /100 \| #185	Fair 36.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	34.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 36.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	34.0 /100 \| #187	Fair 36.3%
Immigrants \| Europe	31.8 /100 \| #188	Fair 36.2%
Immigrants \| Hungary	28.8 /100 \| #189	Fair 36.2%
Panamanians	28.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 36.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	27.5 /100 \| #191	Fair 36.1%
Afghans	25.7 /100 \| #192	Fair 36.1%

Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Brazil (37.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (37.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (37.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Cambodian (37.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Kiowa (37.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Poland	84.4 /100 \| #151	Excellent 37.3%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	83.6 /100 \| #152	Excellent 37.3%
Arapaho	81.8 /100 \| #153	Excellent 37.3%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	81.6 /100 \| #154	Excellent 37.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	80.7 /100 \| #155	Excellent 37.2%
Kiowa	80.4 /100 \| #156	Excellent 37.2%
Immigrants \| Brazil	76.5 /100 \| #157	Good 37.1%
Ute	75.7 /100 \| #158	Good 37.1%
Yaqui	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 37.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	73.9 /100 \| #160	Good 37.0%
Cambodians	71.5 /100 \| #161	Good 37.0%
Immigrants \| Jordan	69.5 /100 \| #162	Good 36.9%
Bermudans	69.3 /100 \| #163	Good 36.9%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	68.9 /100 \| #164	Good 36.9%
Yakama	66.9 /100 \| #165	Good 36.9%