Ugandan vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,593,945 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 30.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,670,112 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 0.80%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ugandan	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Minimum	8.7%	11.7%
Maximum	53.4%	65.3%
Range	44.7%	53.6%
Mean	28.2%	33.3%
Median	28.1%	29.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	19.1%	25.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	36.4%	42.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.3%	17.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.1%	13.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.9%	13.6%

Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Korean (30.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (30.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Ethiopians	91.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 29.8%
Immigrants \| Italy	91.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	91.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	91.0 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 29.9%
Argentineans	90.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 30.0%
Ugandans	89.2 /100 \| #120	Excellent 30.1%
Koreans	88.9 /100 \| #121	Excellent 30.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	88.7 /100 \| #122	Excellent 30.1%
Syrians	88.2 /100 \| #123	Excellent 30.2%
Croatians	88.0 /100 \| #124	Excellent 30.2%
Vietnamese	87.7 /100 \| #125	Excellent 30.2%
Europeans	87.2 /100 \| #126	Excellent 30.2%
Chinese	87.1 /100 \| #127	Excellent 30.2%
Icelanders	86.0 /100 \| #128	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Spain	85.8 /100 \| #129	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	85.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	85.7 /100 \| #131	Excellent 30.3%
New Zealanders	85.5 /100 \| #132	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Morocco	85.2 /100 \| #133	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	85.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 30.4%
Brazilians	84.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 30.4%