Liberian vs Native/Alaskan Family Households
COMPARE
Liberian
Native/Alaskan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Liberians
Natives/Alaskans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Native/Alaskan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,040,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,654,863 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 66.4%, a difference of 7.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Liberian | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 40.9% | 49.9% |
| Maximum | 89.4% | 90.0% |
| Range | 48.5% | 40.1% |
| Mean | 64.2% | 68.3% |
| Median | 63.0% | 67.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 64.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 72.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |