Immigrants from Nigeria vs South American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
South American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
South American Indians
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
60.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs South American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,303,761 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.37%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | South American Indian |
Minimum | 28.6% | 42.9% |
Maximum | 94.1% | 88.8% |
Range | 65.6% | 45.9% |
Mean | 65.9% | 69.0% |
Median | 65.1% | 70.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.8% | 64.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and South American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and German (64.4%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |