Immigrants from Africa vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,727,064 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,282,118 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.51%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Minimum	12.2%	11.1%
Maximum	55.1%	40.5%
Range	42.9%	29.4%
Mean	30.1%	28.0%
Median	28.3%	27.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.5%	25.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	30.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.0%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	5.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%