Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,282,118 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,619,096 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.47%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	11.1%	16.1%
Maximum	40.5%	45.8%
Range	29.4%	29.7%
Mean	28.0%	28.6%
Median	27.4%	28.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.4%	26.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.8%	30.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	4.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.0%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%