Arab vs Chilean Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Arab
Chilean
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Arabs
Chileans
28.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Chilean Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,135,019 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.58%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Chilean |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 47.6% |
| Range | 61.9% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 30.8% | 27.1% |
| Median | 28.6% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.7% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.0% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Chileans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Arabs | 97.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| South American Indians | 96.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.0% |