Ugandan vs Creek Female Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Creek
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Creek
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Creek Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,017,186 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,448,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 31.9%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Creek |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 42.6% |
| Range | 20.8% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 20.5% |
| Median | 11.5% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Central American (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Macedonians | 95.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Nicaraguans | 95.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Arabs | 95.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.6 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Kenyans | 94.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 94.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |