Sudanese vs Ecuadorian Female Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Ecuadorian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Ecuadorians
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Ecuadorian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,131,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,804,285 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 18.9% |
| Range | 23.9% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 11.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Ecuadorians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Norway (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Central American (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |