Subsaharan African vs Welsh Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Welsh
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Welsh
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Welsh Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,244,925 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 28.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Welsh |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 60.0% |
| Range | 10.6% | 58.1% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 10.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 10.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |