Israeli vs South American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
South American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Israelis
South Americans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs South American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,116,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,855,959 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | South American |
| Minimum | 0.023% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 9.5% |
| Range | 14.3% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and South Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |