Israeli vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Israelis
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,077,295 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.857 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 8.5% | 10.1% |
| Range | 8.4% | 9.6% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |