Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Latvia
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Latvia
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 8.9% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 20.1% | 37.7% |
Range | 11.1% | 35.1% |
Mean | 13.3% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Latvia by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |