Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chilean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chilean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chileans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chilean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.83%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Chilean |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 13.0% |
Range | 10.0% | 10.9% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chileans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |