Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Bahamas
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,956,829 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,634,972 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 5.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 7.0% |
Range | 13.5% | 6.5% |
Mean | 3.4% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.98% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Asian (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Mongolian (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Argentinean (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |