Immigrants from Latvia vs Yugoslavian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Yugoslavian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Yugoslavians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Yugoslavian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,721,440 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,572,549 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 6.0% | 8.8% |
Range | 5.7% | 8.5% |
Mean | 2.2% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |