Immigrants from Jordan vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Bermudans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.020%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 11.7% |
| Range | 6.3% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.99% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.98% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |