Immigrants from Ireland vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Soviet Union
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Soviet Union
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,763,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.41%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 10.8% |
| Range | 18.6% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |