Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Indian (Asian)
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Indians (Asian)
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,263,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 2.8% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 27.5% |
Range | 29.4% | 19.5% |
Mean | 16.0% | 15.8% |
Median | 16.3% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Indians (Asian) by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Arapaho (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |