Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Thailand Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Thailand
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Thailand
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Thailand Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,552,896 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,288 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.77%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 14.1% |
| Range | 13.2% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Thailand by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |