Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chilean
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chileans
32.4%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.0%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,797,821 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 32.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,368,241 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 22.0%, a difference of 46.8%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chilean |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.9% |
| Range | 97.7% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 49.4% | 20.5% |
| Median | 38.0% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 26.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 39.0% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Houma (32.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.62%), Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Italian (22.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (22.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Netherlands (22.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Australian (22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Polish (22.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 21.9% |
| South Africans | 98.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 21.9% |
| Australians | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 97.9 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Italians | 97.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Chileans | 97.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Poles | 97.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 97.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Romanians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Jordanians | 96.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 22.2% |