Afghan vs Latvian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Latvian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Afghans
Latvians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Latvian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,842,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,626,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.060%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.25% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| Range | 6.7% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Latvians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Sweden (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |