Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 34.9% |
Range | 19.5% | 32.8% |
Mean | 11.0% | 10.7% |
Median | 10.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |