Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from England
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from England
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 72.8% |
Range | 19.5% | 70.1% |
Mean | 11.0% | 16.7% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from England by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |