Immigrants from Haiti vs Mexican American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Haiti
Mexican American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Haiti
Mexican American Indians
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Haiti vs Mexican American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,156,546 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,470,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Haiti | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 68.4% |
| Range | 34.7% | 67.9% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 17.6% |
| Median | 16.0% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Haiti and Mexican American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Haiti are West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |