Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
77.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,963,245 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.25%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.2% |
| Range | 60.0% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 65.8% |
| Median | 67.0% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 62.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 70.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Romania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and German (64.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |