Chickasaw vs Ukrainian Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ukrainian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Ukrainians
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
34.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ukrainian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,323,660 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 64.2%, a difference of 0.37%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Ukrainian |
Minimum | 40.0% | 35.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.0% | 64.4% |
Mean | 67.1% | 71.3% |
Median | 67.0% | 69.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 64.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 76.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ukrainians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Honduras (64.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (64.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Jamaican (64.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (64.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 52.5 /100 | #173 | Average 64.3% |
Immigrants | Germany | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 64.3% |
Bangladeshis | 44.3 /100 | #175 | Average 64.3% |
Vietnamese | 43.6 /100 | #176 | Average 64.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 42.3 /100 | #177 | Average 64.2% |
Jamaicans | 40.6 /100 | #178 | Average 64.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 38.2 /100 | #179 | Fair 64.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 35.0 /100 | #180 | Fair 64.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 34.9 /100 | #181 | Fair 64.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.6 /100 | #182 | Fair 64.2% |