Chickasaw vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,716,618 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 63.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 40.0% | 51.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.0% | 48.6% |
Mean | 67.1% | 68.4% |
Median | 67.0% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 62.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 74.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |