Belizean vs Immigrants from Romania Family Households
COMPARE
Belizean
Immigrants from Romania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Belizeans
Immigrants from Romania
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
77.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs Immigrants from Romania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,151,479 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,963,245 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belizean | Immigrants from Romania |
Minimum | 42.3% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 79.2% | 91.2% |
Range | 36.9% | 58.6% |
Mean | 65.1% | 65.8% |
Median | 65.1% | 66.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.6% | 62.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 70.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans and Immigrants from Romania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |